Blogs > The Law Blogger

The Law Blogger is a law-related blog that informs and discusses current matters of legal interest to readers of The Oakland Press and to consumers of legal services in the community. We hope readers will  find it entertaining but also informative. The Law Blogger does not, however, impart legal advice, as only attorneys are licensed to provide legal counsel.
For more information email:

Tuesday, December 27, 2011

Disparate Sentences for NBA Stars' Drunk Driving Convictions in Oakland County

A well-respected blog on sentencing picked-up on the infamous NBA drunk driving cases coming out of the 48th District Court in Bloomfield Hills, MI. The blog noted the difference between Jalen Rose's straight-forward OWI conviction [he did 14-days in the OCJ]; and the weapons charge component to Big Ben Wallace's OWI charge, recently resolved in the Oakland County Circuit Court before Judge Shalina Kumar.

Here is what the blog had to say about the two cases:

On the surface, it would appear that Wallace committed a (much?) worse offense but ultimately got a (much?) lighter sentence than Rose.  Of course, maybe there are some specific differences in the cases not obvious on the surface that justify this seeming disparity.  And, perhaps more importantly, the mere fact that can be (and often is) a lot of "low-level" sentencing disparity in this arena does not, in an of itself, necessarily establish that the applicable sentencing law is either unjust or ineffective.

Reading this blog post and being a local criminal defense attorney, I could not resist posting the following comment:

Great blog, DAB. This comment is from a criminal defense attorney in Oakland County, MI, where this Ben Wallace and Jalen Rose stuff went down. First, it is a suburb of Detroit; not in the "D", as we say. Also, Bloomfield Hills, where the district court is seated for that area, is a posh tony burb. (i.e. there are NBA stars driving around partying).
This comment seeks to shed some light on the "disparity" in the sentencing for the two NBA stars. Rose had the misfortune of driving drunk within the jurisdiction of the 48th District Court and to have his case randomly assigned to Judge Kim Small. Judge Small has made national headlines over the years for her drunk driving sentences; they often involve some jail time, even for first offenders with no criminal history. Currently, a group of high-end defense lawyers have challenged Judge Small, seeking to have her disqualified from all drunk driving cases on the basis that she is not fair or impartial, and that her "one-size-fits-all" sentencing policy (i.e. jail for all offenders), violates the "individualized sentencing" mandated by Michigan statute.
This is why Jalen Rose went to jail last summer. 
In the case of Ben Wallace, the big fella was OWI while packing some loaded cold steel in his Cadillac, upping his game to the felony level, and thereby "just passing through" the 48th District Court. Fortunately for him, although he too was randomly assigned to Judge Small, his attorneys executed a "fast break", waiving the preliminary exam, and binding Wallace over to the trial court. Once there, probation was available all day long. Good bye Judge Small; hello Judge Shalina Kumar. 
Unlike Rose, however, Wallace will have a felony weapons conviction on his record. Last year, Wallace spoke of going to law school. This probably puts the kabosh on that notion.
Here is a link to our local blawg coverage of Big Ben.

Sometimes an accused's notoriety helps his cause; sometimes it hurts the case.

Labels: , , , , , , ,


Anonymous Toronto Drinking & Driving Lawyer said...

Drinking and driving is one of the biggest crime in the world and it will makes more tragedy in drunker life as well as also in innocent people life. I really feel very bad the our NBA Star had also done this type crime. I think police should have to take strong action on him.

January 6, 2012 at 12:58 AM 
Blogger DUI Attorney said...

What is the sad part of this is that kids look up to and follow these players. And the worse they act the more they are admired.

How about admiring and coping a scholar or businessman.

DUI attorney in Philadelphia

February 8, 2012 at 3:18 PM 
Blogger Andrew hall said...

An immense moonlike of commendation, reserve it up.
dui lawyers

August 22, 2012 at 9:20 AM 
Blogger Joseph said...

Celebrity stars are no excuse for DUI punishment. Fair trial and conviction should be given regardless of his status. This should not be tolerated nor abuse the position they had now. For legal advice and concerns we can ask help from DUI lawyers.

Joseph @ drink driving penalties

Sydney Drink & Drug Driving lawyers
Beazley Singleton Lawyers
14/370 Pitt St
Sydney NSW 2000
(02)9283 8622

November 3, 2012 at 12:35 AM 
Blogger Carla Dillon said...

You guys out there are performing a great job. Benjamin Yu dwi attorney

December 13, 2012 at 2:10 AM 
Anonymous Mahabub said...

It's rather easy to discriminate between an excellent attorney and negative one. A good attorney never ever stops understanding, and realizes that each instance brings with it a new lesson. In addition, an excellent legal representative wants to assist others in the same market grow intellectually. Two more semesters of law school left, and after that I want to sign up with the elite group of the "good ones."

April 27, 2017 at 4:35 PM 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home